Please make sure to read all previous chapters in order before reading this part or you will be very confused. I will not be explaining things I have already talked about in this post.
We've discovered in previous posts that the world is under 10,000 years old. Life would not have had time to "evolve" in that period of time, so we almost don't have to talk about how rediculous the idea of evolution is. Almost.
In a recent laboratory experiment, some scientists were able to replicate a simple amino acid. They then declared that they had proven that life could form under natural causes in a pre-life world. Is this a logical conclusion?
Nope. In creating amino acids in a controlled laboratory setting, they proved that amino acids could be formed in a controlled laboratory setting. Laboratories are not the same as natural, uncontrolled swamps from "billions of years ago" that may or may not have existed. Is there an evolutionist out there who thinks there was a fully sterile lab set up for amino acids to form in with scientists constantly combining only the right chemicals in only the right amount and in the right patterns?
Also, when they created the amino acid, they failed to mention that it was equal parts right and left handedness. Hands? Handedness basically means which direction it is facing, like your hands. It makes sense that the acids would be half and half, because it's just like flipping a coin. In life, however, all amino acids are left handed. That would be like flipping a coin and getting heads 100 times in a row. This is for each amino acid, which is made of hundreds of molecules. Many proteans are made of hundreds of amino amino acids. Each gene in DNA is made of multiple proteans. DNA is smaller than a virus and is surrounded by highly organized organelles and a cell wall- all made of proteans. If you can flip coins that all land head side up and eventually they all just happen to form a life size model of New York City, give me a call.
Upon any thought at all about molecules, amino acids, and proteans, you begin to realize how silly the idea that life originated from a swamp really is. Then you remember that this can't just be a random arrangement of legos, this single cell is more complex than the entirety of human society. This cell actually has to have life put into it- Frankenstein anyone? Then it needs the capacity to eat, which would probably be sunlight and a pre-existing abundance of fully functional solar powered generators that run of Chlorophyll. These generators also need to be already functioning and a delivery system must also be active and in place to bring the food to important places around the cell.
The cell also has to be able to get rid of waste, and have the know-how to actually do it. It needs to have gasses to intake (yes, even plants need oxygen, as well as carbon) and the ability to do so. Does this sound like something that just happens without any reason?
I don't even want to start talking about splitting cells. In short, the first cell would need to be able to split and survive the split. As the evolutionary theory claims, eventually a two cell organism would form. This is so bigger life-forms can come to be. Unfortunately for them, there are no 2 celled life forms. In fact, there are no 3, 4, or 5 celled life forms either. There is a 6 cell life form, but it's a parasite and cannot live without bigger creatures. Twenty is the number of cells which the second generation of cells would need to aspire to. Can you imagine having a baby that is 20 times your size? I'm thinking the theory of life in a swamp is dead at this point.
So how did life form? It sure wasn't an accident. The complex functions of all life leads us to believe that there was a plan from the beginning. Life was formed with the help of thought and blueprints. It doesn't take a genius to realize this intelligence is God. God planned how life would work and built living creatures with astonishing care and detail.
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment