Origins Part 9: It'll Cost You an Arm and a Leg

We know from previous posts that the Theory of Evolution is an insult to science itself. The time that would be needed for even one beneficial macro-mutation is far longer than even the Evolutionary dating of the Earth.

Beyond this we will now discuss the wing-arm problem.

In the Theory of Evolution, the arms of a land animal (for example) would over millions of years 'evolve' into a pair of wings. If we distill our common sense and take the rest of the theory seriously, there is still a major problem with this part of the theory.

During the in-between stages of an arm-wing, the appendage would become more and more worthless as it approached a true wing.

Flaws of the Arm-Wing
-Cannot hold or grab things
-Has less strength than an arm
-Has less dexterity than an arm
-Are easier to break than an arm
-Cannot be used to fly
-Offset body balance

In short, the Arm-Wing would be dead weight. Such mutations would not be useful to the animal involved, and would make it LESS successful than its 'normal' brothers and sisters. Evolution is based on the "Survival of the Fittest." A mutant animal would be the first to die in the transition period (which is supposed to last millions of years). Even if it survives and reproduces, its descendants for thousands of generations would also be at a disadvantage. The "Survival of the Fittest" would kill anything that altered from the norm before it was able to find a use for its defect.

This problem is apparent in not just arm-wings, but also in every mutation in history. A horse growing its neck longer (to become a giraffe) would find its body unbalanced and have a hard time just walking around. It's blood wouldn't be able to flow through all the extra body space because the heart wasn't affected by the mutation. Perhaps the bones were mutated to be longer, but not the muscles--killing the horse before it was born.

Eyes supposedly formed from light-sensitive patches of skin. These patches would have caused the animal pain and confusion and would have again been extra weight.

I hope you see by now, that just because a mutation for an "improvement" is made doesn't mean that the rest of the body can adjust to that change. Also, the mutation will not become useful for thousands of generations and will be a huge hindrance the whole time. It is clear at this point that the Theory of Evolution is illogical.

Questions? Comments? Leave a comment or the cyber-ghost will haunt you.